Slammer Tour Home
About The Slammer Tour Join The Slammer Tour Slammer Tour Slammers Slammer Tour Stats Slammer Tour Scheduled Events Slammer Tour Event Results Slammer Tour Rules & Format Slammer Tour SlammerGear Slammer Tour Awards Slammer Tour Special Events Slammer Tour A-Z: Sitemap Slammer Tour Member Login
Sponsorship | Gifts | EG Business Directory | ClubTrader | FAQ | Chapters | Fun | Courses | EG | Contacts | Weather | Photos | Facebook | Twitter | Handicap
EG Business Directory
Scratch Golf Club Trader
Great Gift Ideas
Ottawa Sun Scramble: 2011 Sponsorship
The 2010 EG Wind-Up!
Decisions
Submit to Slammer Tour Rulings | Ruling Process

Slammer Tour Ruling Process

Each golfer is responsible to make his/her own decisions on course of play. If an opponent thinks there was an error made, they must announce that they are "filing a claim" before teeing off on the next hole (done in a respectful, sportsmanline manner). Then they must send an email to rulings@slammertour.com for a decision within 24 hours of event completion.

What to include in your claim

  1. course, date and playing partner names
  2. name of Slammer who is the subject of the claim
  3. details of the incident

Appeal Procedure

Send an email to commish@slammertour.com. The Commish will verify ruling with RCGA and report back.

#007: Arnprior, June 20, 2010

Group: Smitty, Ticklar

On #18 Smitty took free relief from a tree stump saying it was ground under repair. Ticklar disagreed. The decision was made that Smitty was not entitled to free relief seeing as the area was not marked nor was there any indication the stump was in the process of being removed. See Rules of Golf Decision 25-8.

#006: Arnprior, June 20, 2010

Group: Eugenie, Billiards, Rulz, Stevie Ray

On #11, Eugenie was in a soft, bare patch near the green. When stepping around the area the ground would move like there was water under the grass but no water could be seen when taking a normal stance. Eugenie took free relief stating that it was casual water. Stevie Ray disagreed. The decision was made that Eugenie was not entitled to take free relief because no water was visible when taking a normal stance. See Rules of Golf Decision 25-4.

#005: Hiawatha, April 17, 2010

Group: Malone, Rulz, AVR, Lee-Zeee
 
On #18, Malone attempted to hit his drive over the gorge towards the 150 marker. Malone said he saw it clear the hazard line of the gorge and fall back into the hazard. He then played his next shot from where he believed his ball last crossed the hazard line with a 1-stroke penalty. Rulz, AVR and Lee-Zee did not see the ball land. Rulz filed claim thinking more evidence was needed that the ball actually did cross the hazard line as the ball was never found (in an area that appeared as though it should be found). The decision was made that Malone proceeding correctly because his sighting was the only evidence one way or the other.

#004: Montebello, September 20, 2009

Group: Rulz, ProZee, TJ, WildCard

On #9, the green has a fence to save balls from falling back into the gorge. ProZee and TJ both took free relief from the fence but took their relief closer to the pin. The fence is an immovable obstruction so they were entitled to free relief but it must be taken no closer to the hole. Penalty was loss of hole.

#003: Cedarhill, May 13, 2009

Group: Malone, Chef, PointZero, WildCard
 
On #6 Malone hit his approach shot left towards the boundary of the course, with his ball coming to rest just beyond a safety fence. Chef's position was that the safety net was a boundary fence - therefore Malone's ball was out of bounds. Malone disagreed and played his ball as if it were still in bounds. The CPGA Pro at Cedarhill, along with the superintendent, both confirmed that this particular safety net was a boundary fence. Malone therefore lost the hole and in turn lost the match to Chef. Note that the actual boundary line is inside of the two posts used to support the safety net.

#002: Pine View, November 12, 2008

Group: SpinMaster, Malone, Rulz

On #18 SpinMaster had a one-foot putt to win the hole and the match vs. Malone. Instead of putting out, SpinMaster picked up the ball thinking that it was an automatic concession by Malone. Malone never conceded the putt and informed SpinMaster he was filing a claim. Given that SpinMaster never finished the hole, he loses the hole and Malone wins the match. Note that SpinMaster could have replaced the ball and putted out with a one-stroke penalty, which would have made the match a draw.

#001: Pine View, May 20, 2008

Group: Eeyore, The Admiral, The Chin

On #17 Eeyore hit his drive and wasn't sure where it went so he then hit a second ball. He hit the second ball again but then found thefirst ball and continued to play out the hole, scoring himself as a 5. Since no formal claim was made before teeing off on the 18th hole, the 5 stands. Eeyore loses his match vs The Admiral on the 17th and wins his match vs The Chin on the 17th. (Admiral had a 4 on the 17th and was 2 up on Eeyore after 16. The Chin had a 6 on 17 and was 1 down to Eeyore after 16.)


Facebook Slammer Tour Fan Page Follow The Slammer Tour on Twitter
The 2010 EG Wind-Up!
The 2010 EG Wind-Up!
Ottawa Sun Scramble: 2011 Sponsorship
Scratch Golf Club Trader
Great Gift Ideas
The Slammer Tour. Fun and competitive match-play golf for everyone!
About | Join The Tour | Slammers | Stats | Schedule | Results | Rules/Format | SlammerGear | Tour Championships | Special Events | A-Z | Login
Sponsorship | Gifts | EG Business Directory | ClubTrader | FAQ | Chapters | Fun | Courses | Executive Golf | Contacts | Weather | Photos | Facebook | Twitter | Handicap